Most wearable devices use motion sensors to record how many steps we take, but studies have found that your pace can affect accuracy. How accurate are physical activity trackers? We discover how they are measured by monitoring your heart rate, steps walked and calories burned. Many of us don't get enough exercise and turn to fitness trackers to help us monitor our progress. But how accurate are physical activity trackers? Fortunately, there is a wealth of research to help you find out, and we've looked at the most recent.
But how accurate are fitness trackers to measure your heart rate and help you enter cardiovascular heart rate zones? Steps and heart rate are just two metrics. Fitness trackers also estimate caloric burn, sleep stages, and more. All of these metrics will look slightly different on each bracelet you wear and how you wear it. In general, the ability of trackers to count steps accurately depends on the type of movements you make throughout the day.
However, the most important movements you make may be simply to stand up and start walking. What crazy activities have you done to make your tracker falsely count as steps? Carrying both devices in the same hand, Rossen walked around 30 Rock for more than an hour. Theoretically, the two devices should have counted the same number of steps. But when Rossen compared the counts of the two devices, they differed by more than 100 steps.
More than 40 million people in the United States have smartwatches or fitness trackers to help them take more steps throughout the day, improve their heart health, burn calories and lose weight. Fitness trackers from different brands vary with regard to the measurement of indicators and are all affected by activity status, indicating that manufacturers of fitness trackers need to improve their algorithms for different activity states. Mikael Mattsson, a senior researcher at the Karolinska Institutet, a medical university in Sweden, said that in research settings, scientists usually calibrate seven different wavelengths of light to produce the most accurate readings, “but you can't fit everything on a small watch,” he explains. When your fitness band interprets data from its motion sensors, it is supposed to ignore movements that are not associated with walking.
But how many calories you burn during an activity is the least reliable metric that fitness trackers calculate. Ultimately, fitness devices are highly personal, functional, and often affordable pieces of technology that can actually track an incredible amount of data. But, assuming that the TEE is still a valid measurement, any fitness tracker must accurately assess your activity level in order to calculate it. Devices are also quite easy to deceive, if you want, for example, to increase your number of steps for sponsored fitness campaigns in the workplace.
Another study found that the heart rate monitors of wrist-based fitness trackers, especially the Apple Watch, work quite well in controlled environments in the studies. Today's fitness bands use multi-axis inertial sensors called accelerometers to detect when the device is in motion. Fitness trackers can help users learn about themselves, recognize patterns, and reflect on their behavior, but the data provided by these devices should not be taken as gospel truth. Researchers were able to take the patterns of deceptive behaviors from all participants and use them to “train the tracker to recognize them as false, thus greatly improving the recognition of the activity.
Previous-generation fitness trackers came with a chest band to measure heart rate by tracking electrical signals on the body. Accelerometers use electromagnetic sensors to detect movement, and fitness trackers interpret that information using an algorithm that trains devices to recognize what counts as a step. .
